<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web 3.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blixtsystems.com/2006/02/web-30/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blixtsystems.com/2006/02/web-30/</link>
	<description>BlixtSystems Flash Actionscript development</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Leo</title>
		<link>http://www.blixtsystems.com/2006/02/web-30/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 09:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blixtsystems.com/?p=23#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I don't think the future of the internet will be increasingly dominated by certain technologies.
I would say that the trend is rather in the opposite direction. Both on the client and server side we see more and more technologies becoming widespread.

Of course putting version numbers on the internet is quite silly and it is evolving in an organic manner, so for sure  all of the points I mention already exists. I'm only speculating as to if they will become more predominant trends in the future.
For example VR and interactive multimedia is almost as old as the internet, so calling them new features would of course be wrong.
When it comes to AI I think there is already work being done on implementing that for websites...for example I have seen that Google are looking for AI programmers.
The thing that is holding that development back is processing power since it's very resource intense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the future of the internet will be increasingly dominated by certain technologies.<br />
I would say that the trend is rather in the opposite direction. Both on the client and server side we see more and more technologies becoming widespread.</p>
<p>Of course putting version numbers on the internet is quite silly and it is evolving in an organic manner, so for sure  all of the points I mention already exists. I&#8217;m only speculating as to if they will become more predominant trends in the future.<br />
For example VR and interactive multimedia is almost as old as the internet, so calling them new features would of course be wrong.<br />
When it comes to AI I think there is already work being done on implementing that for websites&#8230;for example I have seen that Google are looking for AI programmers.<br />
The thing that is holding that development back is processing power since it&#8217;s very resource intense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giridhar</title>
		<link>http://www.blixtsystems.com/2006/02/web-30/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Giridhar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 04:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blixtsystems.com/?p=23#comment-4</guid>
		<description>nicely explained. But what do u think will be technology that will drive the 3.0?

Is 3.0 already in use, atleast in a partial way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nicely explained. But what do u think will be technology that will drive the 3.0?</p>
<p>Is 3.0 already in use, atleast in a partial way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
